<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for schmichael&#039;s blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.schmichael.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.schmichael.com</link>
	<description>good good study, day day up</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failing with MongoDB by Michael Schurter</title>
		<link>http://blog.schmichael.com/2011/11/05/failing-with-mongodb/comment-page-1/#comment-138626</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schurter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schmichael.com/?p=979#comment-138626</guid>
		<description>Great tip. We didn&#039;t adjust the dirty_ratio as far as I know, so that probably caused unneeded IO. That being said I don&#039;t remember iowait being an issue; most of our issues were with the global write lock and complexities of sharding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tip. We didn&#8217;t adjust the dirty_ratio as far as I know, so that probably caused unneeded IO. That being said I don&#8217;t remember iowait being an issue; most of our issues were with the global write lock and complexities of sharding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failing with MongoDB by Jonathan Ultis</title>
		<link>http://blog.schmichael.com/2011/11/05/failing-with-mongodb/comment-page-1/#comment-138625</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Ultis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schmichael.com/?p=979#comment-138625</guid>
		<description>The linux VM flushes the dirty pages in RAM to disk. It starts out flushing lazily. Eventually, if you get too high a percentage of dirty pages, it will start blocking all writes trying to get the deferred IO onto disks - so you don&#039;t lose hours of data in the case of a crash. Is it possible that your IO subsystem just couldn&#039;t keep up with the sustained write rate? And, you didn&#039;t raise your dirty_ratio limit as high as possible to make it act like a pure in-memory DB?

http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/linux-pdflush.htm

Mongo definitely wouldn&#039;t do a good job of putting back pressure on writes without blocking readers, if the IO subsystem is saturated and you hit the dirty_ratio limit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The linux VM flushes the dirty pages in RAM to disk. It starts out flushing lazily. Eventually, if you get too high a percentage of dirty pages, it will start blocking all writes trying to get the deferred IO onto disks &#8211; so you don&#8217;t lose hours of data in the case of a crash. Is it possible that your IO subsystem just couldn&#8217;t keep up with the sustained write rate? And, you didn&#8217;t raise your dirty_ratio limit as high as possible to make it act like a pure in-memory DB?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/linux-pdflush.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/linux-pdflush.htm</a></p>
<p>Mongo definitely wouldn&#8217;t do a good job of putting back pressure on writes without blocking readers, if the IO subsystem is saturated and you hit the dirty_ratio limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failing with MongoDB by Michael Schurter</title>
		<link>http://blog.schmichael.com/2011/11/05/failing-with-mongodb/comment-page-1/#comment-138624</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schurter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schmichael.com/?p=979#comment-138624</guid>
		<description>4x RAID 0+1 SAS drives for the data files, but I think you&#039;re missing the point: our dataset fit in memory, we had syncing turned off, and we didn&#039;t use journaling - the disks should never be touched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4x RAID 0+1 SAS drives for the data files, but I think you&#8217;re missing the point: our dataset fit in memory, we had syncing turned off, and we didn&#8217;t use journaling &#8211; the disks should never be touched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failing with MongoDB by Jonathan Ultis</title>
		<link>http://blog.schmichael.com/2011/11/05/failing-with-mongodb/comment-page-1/#comment-138623</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Ultis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schmichael.com/?p=979#comment-138623</guid>
		<description>What type of storage subsystem were you using on the Mongo boxes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What type of storage subsystem were you using on the Mongo boxes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failing with MongoDB by Quora</title>
		<link>http://blog.schmichael.com/2011/11/05/failing-with-mongodb/comment-page-1/#comment-138622</link>
		<dc:creator>Quora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schmichael.com/?p=979#comment-138622</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How come many startups used MySQL or PostgreSQL rather than MongoDB when they began?...&lt;/strong&gt;

&gt; Many of them seem to migrate to MongoDB later - why&#039;s that? To be clear I have typically seen &quot;sub-systems&quot; moved to MongoDB. Generally to handle the things where SQL is not great. There are also some people who have moved off MongoDB. Or are very...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How come many startups used MySQL or PostgreSQL rather than MongoDB when they began?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&gt; Many of them seem to migrate to MongoDB later &#8211; why&#8217;s that? To be clear I have typically seen &#8220;sub-systems&#8221; moved to MongoDB. Generally to handle the things where SQL is not great. There are also some people who have moved off MongoDB. Or are very&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sharing Python data between processes using mmap by A.jhonson</title>
		<link>http://blog.schmichael.com/2011/05/15/sharing-python-data-between-processes-using-mmap/comment-page-1/#comment-138621</link>
		<dc:creator>A.jhonson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schmichael.com/?p=947#comment-138621</guid>
		<description>please  correct me if i&#039;m wrong but you&#039;ve used the file: mmaptest  to exchange the data betwean the 2 scripts &quot;i&#039;m new to python.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please  correct me if i&#8217;m wrong but you&#8217;ve used the file: mmaptest  to exchange the data betwean the 2 scripts &#8220;i&#8217;m new to python.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

