<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>schmichael&#039;s blog &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.schmichael.com/tag/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.schmichael.com</link>
	<description>good good study, day day up</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:13:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Great article on big government</title>
		<link>http://blog.schmichael.com/2009/09/13/great-article-on-big-government/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.schmichael.com/2009/09/13/great-article-on-big-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schurter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael.susens-schurter.com/blog/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Havoc Pennington has a great post entitled Which Piece of Big Government Are You Against? War on Terror + DoD ~= 21.6% of our budget. I know we can&#8217;t cut it all, but a guy can dream can&#8217;t he? My &#8230; <a href="http://blog.schmichael.com/2009/09/13/great-article-on-big-government/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://log.ometer.com/2009-09.html#12">Havoc Pennington has a great post entitled Which Piece of Big Government Are You Against?</a></p>
<p>War on Terror + DoD ~= 21.6% of our budget.  I know we can&#8217;t cut it all, but a guy can dream can&#8217;t he?  <img src='http://blog.schmichael.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My favorite line is in regards to how different political parties approach budgetary spending:</p>
<blockquote><p>Republicans and Democrats judged by actions not rhetoric: government should be 105% of whatever it just was. Disagreement on where the new 5% goes.</p></blockquote>
<p>So true.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt">Neither party has been fiscally conservative (or even responsible) for the past 30 years.</a>  The Republicans just spend more on bombs while the Dems spend it on <em>evil</em> socialist programs like welfare.</p>
<p><small>Emphasis added to denote sarcasm.</small></p>
<p>I&#8217;d much rather my tax dollars paid for some poor person&#8217;s laziness (as many conservatives see welfare) than have it spent bombing the same country into oblivion twice in a bit over a decade.</p>
<p>It is sad to see us throw away 9% of our federal budget on interest payments.  Hopefully our economy will recover quickly enough for President Obama to start paying back the deficit like Clinton did in the 90s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.schmichael.com/2009/09/13/great-article-on-big-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Evil doesn&#8217;t mean All Good</title>
		<link>http://blog.schmichael.com/2006/01/26/no-evil-doesnt-mean-all-good/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.schmichael.com/2006/01/26/no-evil-doesnt-mean-all-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schurter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.synthesyssolutions.com/michael/2006/01/26/no-evil-doesnt-mean-all-good/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Google&#8217;s censoring the Internet for China &#8212; turns out Google&#8217;s philosophy of not being evil doesn&#8217;t mean they have to be good. Turns out they&#8217;re happy to sit on the fence with the rest of the spineless capitalists (read: &#8230; <a href="http://blog.schmichael.com/2006/01/26/no-evil-doesnt-mean-all-good/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Google&#8217;s censoring the Internet for China &#8212; turns out <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/corporate/tenthings.html">Google&#8217;s philosophy of not being evil</a> doesn&#8217;t mean they have to be good. Turns out they&#8217;re happy to sit on the fence with the rest of the spineless capitalists (read: Yahoo! &#038; MSN) and do whatever the biggest-potential-market-the-world-has-ever-seen tells them to do.</p>
<p><strong>Update: </strong>Censorship in action &#8211; <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=tiananmen">Normal Google</a> vs. <a href="http://images.google.cn/images?q=tiananmen">Google China</a>.</p>
<p>(Scary censhorship example stolen from <a href="http://blog.thepimp.net/index.php/2006/01/27/34-evil-or-not">Planet PHP</a>.)</p>
<p><strong>Update 2:</strong> Evidently Google <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/01/google-in-china.html">agrees</a>:  &#8220;Filtering our search results clearly compromises our mission.&#8221;  (Thanks to <a href="http://www.dancoulter.com">Dan</a> for the link.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.schmichael.com/2006/01/26/no-evil-doesnt-mean-all-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

